Summary:
- - This experiment investigates drag on bluff bodies, analyzing its variation with Reynolds
number using a 3β x 3β wind tunnel. Tests include a balance fairing, 5-inch disk, 5-inch
sphere, large trip ring, and small trip ring. Results show a clear relationship between
drag coefficient and Reynolds number for different body shapes, with notable drag buckets.
Considerations for errors in measurements are discussed, and the study provides insights
for sports ball design.
1. Drag on Bluff Bodies Reports: Here
Nomenclature
- ππππππ‘ = Pressure on the front surface
- πππππ = Pressure on the back surface
- π = Density
- π = Velocity
- πΏ = Length
- π = Viscosity
- πΉπ = Drag Force
- π΄ = Reference Area
- πΆπ· = πΉπ / (1/2 * π * π^2 * π΄)
- π
π = (π * π * πΏ) / π
- πΆπ = (ππππππ‘ - πππππ) / (1/2 * π * π^2)
- πππππππ‘ πππππ = |(ππ₯ ππππππππ‘ππ π£πππ’π - π‘βπππππ‘ππππ π£πππ’π) / π‘βπππππ‘ππππ π£πππ’π| * 100
Results/Discussion
- - The experiment investigates drag on a bluff body, analyzing its variation with Reynolds number
using a 3β x 3β wind tunnel.
- - Tests include a balance fairing, 5-inch disk, 5-inch sphere, large trip ring, and small trip ring.
- - Results show a clear relationship between drag coefficient and Reynolds number for different
body shapes, with notable drag buckets.
- - Errors in measurements and instrumentation are considered, and the experiment provides insights
for sports ball design.
Conclusion
- The experiment aimed to determine the effect of Reynolds number, tripping devices, and flow type on
bluff body drag, contributing significant insights to aeronautical research and design methodologies.
By conducting a series of tests and analyzing the data, we observed clear trends in drag coefficient
variation with Reynolds number, highlighting the importance of shape and flow characteristics in
drag behavior. The identification of drag buckets and their implications for object design, such as
sports balls, underscores the practical applications of our findings. While limitations in velocity
consistency and measurement errors were acknowledged, the overall accuracy and relevance of the experiment's
results remain compelling, offering valuable considerations for future aerodynamic studies and engineering
practices.